A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots
Weizenbaum, J. ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM 9, 36–45 (1966).
Weizenbaum, J. Computer power and human reason. From judgment to calculation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1976).
Darcy, A. et al. Anatomy of a Woebot® (WB001): agent guided CBT for women with postpartum depression. Expert Rev. Med. devices 20, 1035–1049 (2023).
Durden, E. et al. Changes in stress, burnout, and resilience associated with an 8-week intervention with relational agent “Woebot. Internet Intervent. 33, 100637 (2023).
Inkster, B., Kadaba, M. & Subramanian, V. Understanding the impact of an AI-enabled conversational agent mobile app on users’ mental health and wellbeing with a self-reported maternal event: a mixed method real-world data mHealth study. Front. Glob. Women’s Health 4, 1084302 (2023).
Mehta, A. et al. Acceptability and effectiveness of artificial intelligence therapy for anxiety and depression (Youper): longitudinal observational study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e26771 (2021).
Prochaska, J. J. et al. A therapeutic relational agent for reducing problematic substance use (Woebot): development and usability study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e24850 (2021).
Lukas, C. A study about distribution and acceptance of conversational agents for mental health in Germany: keep the Human in the Loop? (2025).
Mental Health UK. Over one in three using AI chatbots for mental health support, as charity calls for urgent safeguards. Available at (2025).
Rousmaniere, T., Goldberg, S. B. & Torous, J. Large language models as mental health providers. Lancet Psychiatry 13, 7–9 (2026).
Stade, E. C., Eichstaedt, J., Kim, J. P. & Stirman, S. W. Readiness evaluation for AI deployment and implementation for mental health: a review and framework. Technol. Mind Behav. (2025).
Censuswide. Over one in three using AI chatbots for mental health support, as charity calls for urgent safeguards. Available at (2025).
Feng, X., Tian, L., Ho, G. W. K., Yorke, J. & Hui, V. The Effectiveness of AI chatbots in alleviating mental distress and promoting health behaviors among adolescents and young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e79850 (2025).
Li, H., Zhang, R., Lee, Y.-C., Kraut, R. E. & Mohr, D. C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being. NPJ Digit. Med. 6, 236 (2023).
OpenAI. Why Language Models Hallucinate. Available at (2025).
Dohnány, S. et al. Technological folie à deux: feedback loops between AI chatbots and mental illness. (2025).
O’Dowd, A. ChatGPT: More than a million users show signs of mental health distress and mania each week, internal data suggest. BMJ 391, r2290 (2025).
Betts A. ChatGPT accused of acting as ‘suicide coach’ in series of US lawsuits. The Guardian (2025).
Østergaard, S. D. Will generative artificial intelligence chatbots generate delusions in individuals prone to psychosis?. Schizophrenia Bull. 49, 1418–1419 (2023).
Pataranutaporn, P et al. “My Boyfriend is AI”: a computational analysis of human-AI companionship in Reddit’s AI community. (2025).
Yankouskaya, A., Liebherr, M. & Ali, R. Can ChatGPT be addictive? A call to examine the shift from support to dependence in AI conversational large language models. Hum. Cent. Intell. Syst. 5, 77–89 (2025).
OpenAI. Strengthening ChatGPT’s Responses in Sensitive Conversations. Available at (2025).
Center for Countering Digital Hate. The Illusion of AI safety. Available at (2025).
American Psychological Association. Use of Generative AI Chatbots and Wellness Applications for Mental Health. An APA Health Advisory. Available at https://www.apa.org/topics/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning/health-advisory-chatbots-wellness-apps.
World Health Organization. WHO Releases AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-modal Models. Available at (2024).
Food and Drug Administration. Generative Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Digital Mental Health Medical Devices. Available at (2025).
Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Digital Mental Health Technology Regulation and Evaluation for Safe and Effective Products. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6866572fadfe29730ea3a9d5/MHRA_guidance_on_DMHT_-_Device_characterisation_regulatory_qualification_and_classification. (2025).
Shumate, J. N. et al. Governing AI in mental health: 50-state legislative review. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e80739 (2025).
Zhang, Q. et al. Generative AI mental health chatbots as therapeutic tools: systematic review and meta-analysis of their role in reducing mental health issues. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e78238 (2025).
Kuhail, M. A. et al. A systematic review on mental health chatbots: trends, design principles, evaluation methods, and future research agenda. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2025, 9942295 (2025). 31 pages.
Hua, Y. et al. A scoping review of large language models for generative tasks in mental health care. npj Digit. Med. 8, 230 (2025).
Jin, Y. et al. The applications of large language models in mental health: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e69284 (2025).
Rahsepar Meadi, M. et al. Exploring the ethical challenges of conversational AI in mental health care: scoping review. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e60432 (2025).
Chung, V. H. A., Bernier, P. & Hudon, A. Mass media narratives of psychiatric adverse events associated with generative AI chatbots: rapid scoping review. JMIR Ment. Health 13, e93040 (2026).
Yeung, J. A., Dalmasso, J., Foschini, L., Dobson, R. J. B. & Kraljevic, Z. The psychogenic machine: simulating AI psychosis, delusion reinforcement and harm enablement in large language models. (2025).
Ferrario, A., Sedlakova, J. & Trachsel, M. The role of humanization and robustness of large language models in conversational artificial intelligence for individuals with depression: a critical analysis. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e56569 (2024).
Frances, A. Warning: AI chatbots will soon dominate psychotherapy. Br. J. Psychiatr. 1–5 (2025).
Liu, J. ChatGPT: perspectives from human-computer interaction and psychology. Front. Artif. Intell. 7, 1418869 (2024).
Tavory, T. Regulating AI in mental health: ethics of care perspective. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e58493 (2024).
Freitas, J. de & Cohen, I. G. The health risks of generative AI-based wellness apps. Nat. Med. 30, 1269–1275 (2024).
Khawaja, Z. & Bélisle-Pipon, J.-C. Your robot therapist is not your therapist: understanding the role of AI-powered mental health chatbots. Front. Digit. Health 5, 1278186 (2023).
Looi, J. C., Allison, S., Bastiampillai, T., Reutens, S. & Looi, R. C. Illusions of intelligence, connection and reality: perils of large-language AI models for people with severe mental illness. Australas. Psychiatr. 34, 5–7 (2026).
Smith, M. G., Bradbury, T. N. & Karney, B. R. Can generative AI chatbots emulate human connection? A relationship science perspective. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1081–1099 (2025).
Jurblum, M. & Selzer, R. Potential promises and perils of artificial intelligence in psychotherapy—the AI psychotherapist (APT). Australas. Psychiatr. 33, 103–105 (2025).
Raile, P. The usefulness of ChatGPT for psychotherapists and patients. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun 11. (2024).
Kalam, K. T., Rahman, J. M., Islam, M. R. & Dewan, S. M. R. ChatGPT and mental health: Friends or foes?. Health Sci. Rep. 7, e1912 (2024).
Blease, C. & Torous, J. ChatGPT and mental healthcare: balancing benefits with risks of harms. BMJ Ment. Health 26. (2023).
Solaiman, B. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and decision-making: Legal & ethical hurdles for implementation in mental health. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 97, 102028 (2024).
McStay, A. Emulated empathy: can risks be countered by a soft-law standard?. IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc. 6, 250–256 (2025).
Choudhury, M. de, Pendse, S. R. & Kumar, N. Benefits and harms of large language models in digital mental health. (2023).
Jesudason, D., Bacchi, S. & Bastiampillai, T. Artificial intelligence (AI) in psychotherapy: a challenging frontier. Australas. Psychiatry 33, 629–632 (2025).
Rahsepar Meadi, M., Bernstein, J. S., Batelaan, N., van Balkom, A. J. L. M. & Metselaar, S. Does a lack of emotions make chatbots unfit to be psychotherapists?. Bioethics 38, 503–510 (2024).
Artamonov, D. S., Nevvazhay, I. D., Suslov, I. V., Syusyukin, V. A. & Tikhonova, S. V. “Eternal Youth”: the ethics of an ideological alliance between youth and artificial intelligence. In 2025 IEEE Ural-Siberian Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT) 312–316 (IEEE, 2025).
Maeda, T. & Quan-Haase, A. When human-AI interactions become parasocial: agency and anthropomorphism in affective design. In The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 1068–1077 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2024).
Lawrence, H. R. et al. The opportunities and risks of large language models in mental health. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e59479 (2024).
Timmons, A. C. et al. A call to action on assessing and mitigating bias in artificial intelligence applications for mental health. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.18, 1062–1096 (2023).
Mlonyeni, P. M. T. Personal AI, deception, and the problem of emotional bubbles. AI Soc. 40, 1927–1938 (2025).
Campbell, L. O., Babb, K., Lambie, G. W. & Hayes, B. G. An examination of generative AI response to suicide inquires: content analysis. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e73623 (2025).
Elyoseph, Z. & Levkovich, I. Beyond human expertise: the promise and limitations of ChatGPT in suicide risk assessment. Front. Psychiatry 14, 1213141 (2023).
Elyoseph, Z. & Levkovich, I. Comparing the perspectives of generative AI, mental health experts, and the general public on schizophrenia recovery: case vignette study. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e53043 (2024).
Heston, T. F. Evaluating Risk Progression in Mental Health Chatbots Using Escalating Prompts (2023). medRxiv, 2023-09.
Levkovich, I. & Elyoseph, Z. Suicide risk assessments through the eyes of ChatGPT-3.5 versus ChatGPT-4: vignette study. JMIR Ment. Health 10, e51232 (2023).
Toklu Baloğlu, H. Effect of ChatGPT use on eating disorders and body image. World J. Psychiatry 15, 107122 (2025).
Farhat, F. ChatGPT as a complementary mental health resource: a boon or a bane. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 52, 1111–1114 (2024).
Grabb, D., Lamparth, M. & Vasan, N. Risks from language models for automated mental healthcare: ethics and structure for implementation. (2024).
Moore, J. et al. Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 599–627 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2025).
van Meter, A. R., Wheaton, M. G., Cosgrove, V. E., Andreadis, K. & Robertson, R. E. The Goldilocks Zone: finding the right balance of user and institutional risk for suicide-related generative AI queries. PLoS Digit. Health 4, e0000711 (2025).
Aleem, M., Zahoor, I., & Naseem, M. Towards culturally adaptive large language models in mental health: using ChatGPT as a case study. In Companion publication of the 2024 conference on computer-supported cooperative work and social computing, 240–247 (2024).
Gabriel, S., Puri, I., Xu, X., Malgaroli, M. & Ghassemi, M. Can AI relate: testing large language model response for mental health support. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 (eds. Al-Onaizan, Y., Bansal, M. & Chen, Y.-N.) 2206–2221 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2024).
An, R., Byron, C. W., Chen, C. & Xiang, X. A field test of popular chatbots’ responses to questions concerning negative body image. Health Behav. Res. 6; (2023).
Moylan, K. & Doherty, K. Expert and interdisciplinary analysis of AI-driven chatbots for mental health support: mixed methods study. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e67114 (2025).
Scholich, T., Barr, M., Wiltsey Stirman, S. & Raj, S. A comparison of responses from human therapists and large language model-based chatbots to assess therapeutic communication: mixed methods study. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e69709 (2025).
Spallek, S., Birrell, L., Kershaw, S., Devine, E. K. & Thornton, L. Can we use ChatGPT for mental health and substance use education? Examining its quality and potential harms. JMIR Med. Educ. 9, e51243 (2023).
Sobowale, K. & Humphrey, D. K. Evaluating the quality of psychotherapy conversational agents: framework development and cross-sectional study. JMIR Format. Res. 9, e65605 (2025).
De Freitas, J., Uğuralp, A. K., Oğuz-Uğuralp, Z. & Puntoni, S. Chatbots and mental health: insights into the safety of generative AI. J. Consum. Psychol. 34, 481–491 (2024).
Guo, Z. et al. Large language models for mental health applications: systematic review. JMIR Ment. health 11, e57400 (2024).
Sarkar, S., Gaur, M., Chen, L. K., Garg, M. & Srivastava, B. A review of the explainability and safety of conversational agents for mental health to identify avenues for improvement. Front. Artif. Intell. 6, 1229805. (2023).
Lee, H. S. et al. Artificial intelligence conversational agents in mental health: Patients see potential, but prefer humans in the loop. Front. Psychiatry 15, 1505024 (2024).
Reichenpfader, D., Affolter, L., Gabarron, E. & Denecke, K. Opportunities, requirements, and risks of a student mental health chatbot: a qualitative user-centered, multi-method approach. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 325, 67–72 (2025).
Yoo, D. W., Shi, J. M., Rodriguez, V. J. & Saha, K. AI Chatbots for mental health: values and harms from lived experiences of depression. (2025).
Maples, B., Cerit, M., Vishwanath, A. & Pea, R. Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots. Npj Ment. health Res. 3, 4 (2024).
Ma, Z., Mei, Y. & Su, Z. Understanding the benefits and challenges of using large language model-based conversational agents for mental well-being support. Annu. Symp. Proc. AMIA Symp. 2023, 1105–1114 (2024).
Denecke, K., Lopez-Campos, G., Rivera-Romero, O. & Gabarron, E. The unexpected harms of artificial intelligence in healthcare: reflections on four real-world cases. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 325, 55–60 (2025).
Choi, R., Kim, T., Park, S., Kim, J. G. & Lee, S.-J. Private yet social: how LLM chatbots support and challenge eating disorder recovery. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19 (ed. Yamashita, N. et al.) (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2025).
Stadler, M., Bannert, M. & Sailer, M. Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry. Comput. Hum. Behav. 160, 108386. (2024).
Gerlich, M. AI tools in society: impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies 15, 6 (2025).
Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T. & Kim, J. H. Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 21. (2024).
Khan, W. M. Analyzing the AI tools’ impact on critical thinking in BS English Students at Pakistani Universities. J. Appl. Linguist. TESOL 7, 1232–1238 (2024).
Gao, J., Zhang, J. & Li, Y. Do AI chatbot-integrated writing tasks influence writing self-efficacy and critical thinking ability? An exploratory study. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 9, 100472. (2025).
Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B. & Lu, Y. How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learn. Environ. 12. (2025).
Mohammad, B. et al. The pros and cons of using ChatGPT in medical education: a scoping review. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 305, 644–647 (2023).
Parsakia, K. The effect of chatbots and AI on the self-efficacy, self-esteem, problem-solving and critical thinking of students. HN 1, 71–76 (2023).
Lee, H.-P. et al. The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (ed. Yamashita, N. et al.) 1–22 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2025).
Kosmyna, N. et al. Your brain on ChatGPT: accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task. (2025).
Pataranutaporn, P., Archiwaranguprok, C., Chan, S. W., Loftus, E. & Maes, P. Slip through the chat: Subtle injection of false information in llm chatbot conversations increases false memory formation. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 1297–1313 (2025).
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A. & Khan, T. I. Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High Educ. 21. (2024).
Jammeli, H., Khefacha, A., Séllei, B. & Verny, J. The impact of AI tools in education environment. In 2024 12th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET). 208–214 (IEEE, 2024).
Ayele, N. & Tsoi, L. The Usage of New AI Technologies by College Students and its Influence on Learning and Dependence (JSTOR, 2024).
Hading, E. F., Rustan, D. R. H. P. & Ruing, F. H. EFL Students’ perceptions on the integration of AI in fostering critical thinking skills. glens 2, 1–10 (2024).
Huang, S. et al. AI technology panic: Is AI dependence bad for mental health? A cross-lagged panel model and the mediating roles of motivations for AI use among adolescents. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 17, 1087–1102 (2024).
Hu, B., Mao, Y. & Kim, K. J. How social anxiety leads to problematic use of conversational AI: the roles of loneliness, rumination, and mind perception. Comput. Hum. Behav. 145, 107760. (2023).
Liu, A. R., Pataranutaporn, P. & Maes, P. Chatbot companionship: a mixed-methods study of companion chatbot usage patterns and their relationship to loneliness in active users. (2024).
Zhang, X., Yin, M., Zhang, M., Li, Z. & Li, H. The development and validation of an artificial intelligence chatbot dependence scale. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 28, 126–131 (2025).
Ibrahim, L., Huang, S., Ahmad, L., Bhatt, U. & Anderljung, M. Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systems. AIES 8, 1302–1310 (2025).
Yankouskaya, A. et al. LLM-D12: A dual-dimensional scale of instrumental and relational dependencies on large language models. ACM Trans. Web. (2025).
Yu, Q. & Lan, X. Exploring the impact of anthropomorphism in role-playing AI chatbots on media dependency: a case study of Xuanhe AI. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium of Chinese CHI. 170–181 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2024).
Adewale, M. D. & Muhammad, U. I. From virtual companions to forbidden attractions: the seductive rise of artificial intelligence love, loneliness, and intimacy—a systematic review. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. (2025).
Dong, X., Xie, J. & Gong, H. A meta-analysis of artificial intelligence technologies use and loneliness: examining the influence of physical embodiment, age differences, and effect direction. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 28, 233–242 (2025).
Herbener, A. B. & Damholdt, M. F. Are lonely youngsters turning to chatbots for companionship? The relationship between chatbot usage and social connectedness in Danish high-school students. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 196, 103409. (2025).
Zhang, X. et al. Investigating AI chatbot dependence: associations with internet and smartphone dependence, mental health outcomes, and the moderating role of usage purposes. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 1–13. (2025).
Fang, C. M. et al. How AI and human behaviors shape psychosocial effects of extended chatbot use: a longitudinal randomized controlled study. (2025).
Yao, R., Qi, G., Sheng, D., Sun, H. & Zhang, J. Connecting self-esteem to problematic AI chatbot use: the multiple mediating roles of positive and negative psychological states. Front. Psychol. 16, 1453072. (2025).
Marriott, H. R. & Pitardi, V. One is the loneliest number… Two can be as bad as one. The influence of AI friendship apps on users’ well-being and addiction. Psychol. Mark. 41, 86–101 (2024).
Zhang, K., Xie, Y., Chen, D., Ji, Z. & Wang, J. Effects of attractions and social attributes on peoples’ usage intention and media dependence towards chatbot: the mediating role of parasocial interaction and emotional support. BMC Psychol. 13, 986 (2025).
Lai, L., Pan, Y., Xu, R. & Jiang, Y. Depression and the use of conversational AI for companionship among college students: the mediating role of loneliness and the moderating effects of gender and mind perception. Front. Public Health 13, 1580826. (2025).
Huang, H., Shi, L. & Pei, X. When AI becomes a friend: The “Emotional” and “Rational” mechanism of problematic use in generative AI chatbot interactions. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 1–19 (2025).
Li, H., Tian, J., Yin, M. & Zhang, X. Social-ecological factors associated with AI chatbot use and dependence. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 1–15 (2025).
Wang, Y. Emotional dependence path of artificial intelligence chatbot based on structural equation modeling. Proc. Comput. Sci. 247, 1089–1094 (2024).
Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., Alhalbusi, H. & Mukhaini, M. A. Me and My AI bot: exploring the ‘aiholic’ phenomenon and university students’ dependency on generative AI chatbots—Is this the new academic addiction?. (2024).
Yuan, Z., Cheng, X. & Duan, Y. Impact of media dependence: How emotional interactions between users and chat robots affect human socialization?. Front. Psychol. 15, 1388860. (2024).
Huang, Y. & Huang, H. Exploring the effect of attachment on technology addiction to generative AI chatbots: a structural equation modeling analysis. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 41, 9440–9449 (2025).
Xie, T., Pentina, I. & Hancock, T. Friend, mentor, lover: does chatbot engagement lead to psychological dependence?. JOSM 34, 806–828 (2023).
Shen, M. K. & Yoon, D. The dark addiction patterns of current AI chatbot interfaces. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (eds. Yamashita, N., Evers, V., Yatani, K. & Ding, X.) 1–7 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2025).
Hernandez, H. E. et al. Dependency on Meta AI chatbot in messenger among STEM and non-STEM students in higher education. (2025).
Chandra, M. et al. From lived experience to insight: unpacking the psychological risks of using AI conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 975–1004 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2025).
Zhang, X. et al. Exploring artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot usage behaviors and their association with mental health outcomes in Chinese university students. J. Affect. Disord. 380, 394–400 (2025).
Zhang, R. et al. The dark side of AI companionship: a taxonomy of harmful algorithmic behaviors in human-AI relationships. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (ed. Yamashita, N. et al.) 1–17 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2025).
Laestadius, L., Bishop, A., Gonzalez, M., Illenčík, D. & Campos-Castillo, C. Too human and not human enough: a grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot Replika. N. Media Soc. 26, 5923–5941 (2024).
Namvarpour, M., Brofsky, B., Medina, J., Akter, M. & Razi, A. Understanding teen overreliance on AI companion chatbots through self-reported Reddit narratives. (2025).
Richet, J.-L. AI companionship or digital entrapment? investigating the impact of anthropomorphic AI-based chatbots. J. Innov. Knowl. 10, 100835. (2025).
Bunim, E. Parasocial dependency associated with artificial intelligence chatbots. Zenodo (2024).
Xie, T. & Pentina, I. Attachment theory as a framework to understand relationships with social chatbots: a case study of Replika. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (ed. Bui, T.) (Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2022).
Banks, J. Deletion, departure, death: experiences of AI companion loss. J. Soc. Personal. Relatsh. 41, 3547–3572 (2024).
Hudon, A. & Stip, E. Delusional experiences emerging from AI chatbot interactions or AI psychosis. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e85799 (2025).
Chamarthi, V. S., Das, P. & Kashyap, R. AI as a novel digital stressor in adolescent psychosis: clinical and ethical implications. Int. J. Psychiatr. Med. (2025).
Kirschenbaum, M. A. et al. Google search activity in early psychosis: a qualitative analysis of internet search query content in first episode psychosis. Early Intervent. Psychiatr. 14, 606–612 (2020).
Caramancion, K. M. Large language models vs. search engines: evaluating user preferences across varied information retrieval scenarios. (2024).
Carlbring, P. & Andersson, G. Commentary: AI psychosis is not a new threat: lessons from media-induced delusions. Internet Intervent. 42, 100882. (2025).
Morrin, H. et al. Delusions by design? How everyday AIs might be fuelling psychosis (and what can be done about it). (2025).
Osler, L. Hallucinating with AI: AI psychosis as distributed delusions. (2025).
Kosinski, M. Using big data. In The handbook of social psychology (6th ed.) (eds. Gilbert, D. T. Fiske, S. T. Finkel, E. J. & Mendes W. B.) (Situational Press, 2025).
Hua, Y. et al. Charting the evolution of artificial intelligence mental health chatbots from rule-based systems to large language models: a systematic review. World Psychiatry 24, 383–394 (2025).
Hua, Y. et al. Standardizing and scaffolding health care AI-chatbot evaluation: systematic review. JMIR AI 4, e69006 (2025).
Bainbridge, L. in Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man–Machine Systems. 129–135 (Elsevier, 1983).
Ciudad-Fernández, V., Hammerstein, C. von & Billieux, J. People are not becoming “AIholic”: questioning the “ChatGPT addiction” construct. Addict. Behav. 166, 108325 (2025).
Guingrich, R. E. & Graziano, M. S. A. Chatbots as social companions: How people perceive consciousness, human likeness, and social health benefits in machines. (2023).
Eyssel, F. & Reich, N. Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots)—on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 121–122 (IEEE, 2013).
Keshavan, M., Torous, J. & Yassin, W. Do generative AI chatbots increase psychosis risk?. World Psychiatry 25, 150–151 (2026).
Luo, X. et al. Seeking emotional and mental health support from generative AI: mixed-methods study of ChatGPT user experiences. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e77951 (2025).
Alanezi, F. Assessing the effectiveness of ChatGPT in delivering mental health support: a qualitative study. J. Multidiscip. Healthcare 461–471. (2024).
Oo, C. T. et al. The benefits and future potential of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) on mental health: a Delphi study. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being 21, 2621802 (2026).
Siddals, S., Torous, J. & Coxon, A. It happened to be the perfect thing: experiences of generative AI chatbots for mental health. Npj Ment. Health Res. 3, 48 (2024). O
Cross, S. et al. Use of AI in mental health care: community and mental health professionals survey. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e60589 (2024).
Blease, C., Worthen, A. & Torous, J. Psychiatrists’ experiences and opinions of generative artificial intelligence in mental healthcare: an online mixed methods survey. Psychiatry Res. 333, 115724 (2024).
Goldie, J., Dennis, S., Hipgrave, L. & Coleman, A. Practitioner perspectives on the uses of generative AI chatbots in mental health care: mixed methods study. JMIR Hum. Factors 12, e71065 (2025). Sep 16.
Torous, J. & Cipriani, A. A paradigm shift in progress: generative AI’s evolving role in mental health care. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e82369 (2025).
Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473 (2018).
Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71 (2021).
Gottlieb, M., Haas, M. R. C., Daniel, M. & Chan, T. M. The scoping review: a flexible, inclusive, and iterative approach to knowledge synthesis. AEM Educ. Train. 5, e10609 (2021).
Logan, J. et al. Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: a scoping review. Res. Synth. methods 15, 950–963 (2024).
Peters, M. D. J. et al. Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Syst. Rev. 10, 263 (2021).
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D. & Kirk, S. The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS One 10, e0138237 (2015).
Gehanno, J. F., Rollin, L. & Darmoni, S. Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 13, 7 (2013).
Diel, A. et al. Human performance in detecting deepfakes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 papers. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 16, 100538 (2024).
Feinstein, A. R. & Cicchetti, D. V. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of the two paradoxes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 43, 543–549 (1990).
