Perceptions of simulated artificial intelligence in medical consultations: associations with stress, memory, and perceived credibility
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P. & Suman, R. Telemedicine for healthcare: capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens. Int. 2, 100117 (2021).
Opel, N. & Breakspear, M. Transforming mental health research and care through artificial intelligence. Science 391, 249–258 (2026).
Martinengo, L. et al. Conversational agents in health care: expert interviews to inform the definition, classification, and conceptual framework. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e50767 (2023).
Győrffy, Z., Radó, N. & Mesko, B. Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition. PLoS ONE 15, e0238658 (2020).
Fallowfield, L. & Jenkins, V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. The Lancet 363, 312–319 (2004).
Kessels, R. P. C. Patients’ memory for medical information. J. R. Soc. Med. 96, 219–222 (2003).
Moulaei, K., Sheikhtaheri, A., Fatehi, F., Shanbehzadeh, M. & Bahaadinbeigy, K. Patients’ perspectives and preferences toward telemedicine versus in-person visits: a mixed-methods study on 1226 patients. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 23, 261 (2023).
Li, J., Dada, A., Puladi, B., Kleesiek, J. & Egger, J. ChatGPT in healthcare: a taxonomy and systematic review. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 245, 108013 (2024).
Esber, A. et al. Predictors of patients’ acceptance of video consultation in general practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Digit. Health 9, 20552076221149317 (2023).
Vigier, M., Thorson, K. R., Andritsch, E. & Schwerdtfeger, A. R. An investigation of patients’ and doctors’ autonomic nervous system responses throughout news-focused medical consultations. Health Commun 39, 2256–2266 (2024).
Wiegner, L., Hange, D., Björkelund, C. & Ahlborg, G. Prevalence of perceived stress and associations to symptoms of exhaustion, depression and anxiety in a working age population seeking primary care—an observational study. BMC Fam. Pract. 16, 38 (2015).
Reblin, M. et al. Communication style affects physiological response in simulated cancer risk reduction interactions: communication and physiological response. J. Appl. Biobehav. Res. 17, 129–156 (2012).
Van Dulmen, A. M. & Bensing, J. M. Health promoting effects of the physician-patient encounter. Psychol. Health Med. 7, 289–300 (2002).
Birkás, B., Kiss, B., Coelho, C. M. & Zsidó, A. N. The role of self-reported fear and disgust in the activation of behavioral harm avoidance related to medical settings. Front. Psychiatry 14, 1074370 (2023).
Cosley, B. J., McCoy, S. K., Saslow, L. R. & Epel, E. S. Is compassion for others stress buffering? Consequences of compassion and social support for physiological reactivity to stress. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46, 816–823 (2010).
Thorsteinsson, E. B. & James, J. E. A Meta-analysis of the effects of experimental manipulations of social support during laboratory stress. Psychol. Health 14, 869–886 (1999).
Uchino, B. N., Carlisle, M., Birmingham, W. & Vaughn, A. A. Social support and the reactivity hypothesis: conceptual issues in examining the efficacy of received support during acute psychological stress. Biol. Psychol. 86, 137–142 (2011).
Laranjo, L. et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 25, 1248–1258 (2018).
Tudor Car, L. et al. Conversational agents in health care: scoping review and conceptual analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e17158 (2020).
Subramanya, V. et al. Empathetic communication in telemedicine: a pilot study. PRiMER 8, 36 (2024).
Wu, D. C., Zhao, X. & Wu, J. Online physician-patient interaction and patient satisfaction: empirical study of the internet hospital service. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e39089 (2023).
Yi-No Kang, E., Chen, D.-R. & Chen, Y.-Y. Associations between literacy and attitudes toward artificial intelligence–assisted medical consultations: the mediating role of perceived distrust and efficiency of artificial intelligence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 139, 107529 (2023).
Wutz, M., Hermes, M., Winter, V. & Köberlein-Neu, J. Factors influencing the acceptability, acceptance, and adoption of conversational agents in health care: integrative review. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e46548 (2023).
Mayer, C. J. et al. User preferences and trust in hypothetical analog, digitalized and AI-based medical consultation scenarios: An online discrete choice survey. Comput. Hum. Behav. 161, 108419 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108419.
Riedl, R., Hogeterp, S. A. & Reuter, M. Do patients prefer a human doctor, artificial intelligence, or a blend, and is this preference dependent on medical discipline? Empirical evidence and implications for medical practice. Front. Psychol. 15, 1422177 (2024).
Tates, K., Antheunis, M. L., Kanters, S., Nieboer, T. E. & Gerritse, M. B. The effect of screen-to-screen versus face-to-face consultation on doctor-patient communication: an experimental study with simulated patients. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e421 (2017).
Nguyen, L., Phillips, C. V., Rodriguez, A., Young, A. R. & Ramdass, J. V. Relationships matter! Social safeness and self-disclosure may influence the relationship between perceived social support and well-being for in-person and online relationships. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 52, 1211–1220 (2022).
Gall, D., Roth, D., Stauffert, J.-P., Zarges, J. & Latoschik, M. E. Embodiment in virtual reality intensifies emotional responses to virtual stimuli. Front. Psychol. 12, 674179 (2021).
Laymouna, M. et al. Roles, users, benefits, and limitations of Chatbots in health care: rapid review. J. Med. Internet Res. 26, e56930 (2024).
Muehlensiepen, F., Petit, P., Knitza, J., Welcker, M. & Vuillerme, N. Prediction of the acceptance of telemedicine among rheumatic patients: a machine learning-powered secondary analysis of German survey data. Rheumatol. Int. 44, 523–534 (2024).
Sturesson, L. & Groth, K. Clinicians’ selection criteria for video visits in outpatient care: qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e288 (2018).
Lawrence, K. et al. Informed consent for ambient documentation using generative AI in ambulatory care. JAMA Netw. Open 8, e2522400 (2025).
Li, W. & Liu, X. Anxiety about artificial intelligence from patient and doctor-physician. Patient Educ. Couns. 133, 108619 (2025).
Martikainen, S., Falcon, M., Wikström, V., Peltola, S. & Saarikivi, K. Perceptions of doctors’ empathy and patients’ subjective health status at an online clinic: development of an empathic anamnesis questionnaire. Psychosom. Med. 84, 513–521 (2022).
Tokumasu, K. et al. Differences in stress perception of medical students depending on in-person communication and online communication during the COVID−19 pandemic: a Japanese cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 20, 1579 (2023).
Glikson, E. & Woolley, A. W. Human trust in artificial intelligence: review of empirical research. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14, 627–660 (2020).
Schwabe, L., Joëls, M., Roozendaal, B., Wolf, O. T. & Oitzl, M. S. Stress effects on memory: an update and integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1740–1749 (2012).
Medendorp, N. M., Visser, L. N. C., Hillen, M. A., De Haes, J. C. J. M. & Smets, E. M. A. How oncologists’ communication improves (analogue) patients’ recall of information. A randomized video-vignettes study. Patient Educ. Couns. 100, 1338–1344 (2017).
Visser, L. N. C. et al. Are psychophysiological arousal and self-reported emotional stress during an oncological consultation related to memory of medical information? An experimental study. Stress 20, 103–111 (2017).
Van Osch, M., Sep, M., Van Vliet, L. M., Van Dulmen, S. & Bensing, J. M. Reducing patients’ anxiety and uncertainty, and improving recall in bad news consultations. Health Psychol. 33, 1382–1390 (2014).
Hillen, M. A. et al. Oncologists’ non-verbal behavior and analog patients’ recall of information. Acta Oncol. 55, 671–679 (2016).
Merz, C. J. & Wolf, O. T. How stress hormones shape memories of fear and anxiety in humans. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 142, 104901 (2022).
Vogel, S. & Schwabe, L. Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom. Npj Sci. Learn. 1, 16011 (2016).
Öhman, A., Flykt, A. & Esteves, F. Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 466–478 (2001).
Dickerson, S. S. & Kemeny, M. E. Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol. Bull. 130, 355–391 (2004).
Stoffel, M., Neubauer, A. B. & Ditzen, B. How to assess and interpret everyday life salivary cortisol measures: a tutorial on practical and statistical considerations. Psychoneuroendocrinology 133, 105391 (2021).
Idan, A., Wallach, H. S., Almagor, M., Waisman, Y. & Linn, S. Mediated telemedicine vs. face-to-face medicine: efficiency in distress reduction. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 9, 333–339 (2015).
Del Piccolo, L. & Finset, A. Patients’ autonomic activation during clinical interaction: a review of empirical studies. Patient Educ. Couns. 101, 195–208 (2018).
Chen, D. et al. Patient perceptions of empathy in physician and artificial intelligence Chatbot responses to patient questions about cancer. Npj Digit. Med. 8, 275 (2025).
Huang, M.-H. & Rust, R. T. Artificial intelligence in service. J. Serv. Res. 21, 155–172 (2018).
Holthöwer, J. & Van Doorn, J. Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 51, 767–784 (2023).
Lucas, G. M., Gratch, J., King, A. & Morency, L.-P. It’s only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 94–100 (2014).
Visser, L. N. C., Tollenaar, M. S., de Haes, H. C. J. M. & Smets, E. M. A. The value of physicians’ affect-oriented communication for patients’ recall of information. Patient Educ. Couns. 100, 2116–2120 (2017).
Zendel, B. R., Power, B. V., DiDonato, R. M. & Hutchings, V. M. M. Memory deficits for health information provided through a telehealth video conferencing system. Front. Psychol. 12, 604074 (2021).
Paivio, A. Imagery and Verbal Processes. (Psychology Press, 2013).
Dolcos, F. et al. Dissociating and linking divergent effects of emotion on cognition: insights from current research and emerging directions. Front. Psychol. 16, 1483373 (2025).
Garrison, K. E. & Schmeichel, B. J. Effects of emotional content on working memory capacity. Cogn. Emot. 33, 370–377 (2019).
Sauerbrei, A., Kerasidou, A., Lucivero, F. & Hallowell, N. The impact of artificial intelligence on the person-centred, doctor-patient relationship: some problems and solutions. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 23, 73 (2023).
Hassan, N. et al. Systematic review to understand users perspectives on AI-enabled decision aids to inform shared decision making. Npj Digit. Med. 7, 332 (2024).
As’ad, M., Faran, N. & Joharji, H. AI-supported shared decision-making (AI-SDM): conceptual framework. JMIR AI 4, e75866–e75866 (2025).
Mahal, J. et al. When digital fits and when human matters: attachment, trust, and user profiles in communication formats in primary care from face-to-face to AI. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 2791–1642 (2026).
Li, Q., Luximon, Y. & Zhang, J. The influence of anthropomorphic cues on patients’ perceived anthropomorphism, social presence, trust building, and acceptance of health care conversational agents: within-subject web-based experiment. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e44479 (2023).
Waisbren, S. E. Effect of expanded newborn screening for biochemical genetic disorders on child outcomes and parental stress. JAMA 290, 2564 (2003).
Williamson, S. et al. Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: a mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences. Prev. Med. Rep. 13, 189–195 (2019).
Sallam, M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare 11, 887 (2023).
Ten Haaft, B. H. E. A. et al. Online video versus face-to-face patient–surgeon consultation: a systematic review. Surg. Endosc. 38, 7064–7072 (2024).
Mayer, C. J., Mahal, J., Ehrenthal, J. C. & Ditzen, B. Digitalization and physician-patient interaction (VERIKOM). (2022).
Roos, R. A. Huntington’s disease: a clinical review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 5, 40 (2010).
Denecke, K., Meier, L., Bauer, J., Bender, M. & Lueg, C. Information capturing in Pre-Hospital Emergency Medical Settings (EMS). Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 270, 613–617 (2020).
Lima, M. R., Wairagkar, M., Natarajan, N., Vaitheswaran, S. & Vaidyanathan, R. Robotic telemedicine for mental health: a multimodal approach to improve human-robot engagement. Front. Robot. AI 8, 618866 (2021).
Abdullah, N. N. et al. MARIA (Medical Assistance and Rehabilitation Intelligent Agent) for Medication Adherence in Patients with Heart Failure: empirical results from a Wizard of Oz systematic conversational agent design clinical protocol. JMIR Cardio. 9, e55846 (2025).
Sørensen, L., Sagen Johannesen, D. T., Melkas, H. & Johnsen, H. M. User acceptance of a home robotic assistant for individuals with physical disabilities: explorative qualitative study. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 12, e63641 (2025).
Hartholt, A. et al. in Intelligent Virtual Agents (eds. Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C. & Shimodaira, H.) vol. 8108, 368–381 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013).
Schlögl, S., Doherty, G. & Luz, S. Wizard of Oz experimentation for language technology applications: challenges and tools. Interact. Comput. 27, 592–615 (2015).
Fraser, N. M. & Gilbert, G. N. Simulating speech systems. Comput. Speech Lang. 5, 81–99 (1991).
Riek, L. Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J. Hum. Robot. Interact. 119–136 (2012).
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. G. Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007).
Strahler, J., Skoluda, N., Kappert, M. B. & Nater, U. M. Simultaneous measurement of salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase: Application and recommendations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 83, 657–677 (2017).
Gaab, J., Rohleder, N., Nater, U. M. & Ehlert, U. Psychological determinants of the cortisol stress response: the role of anticipatory cognitive appraisal. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30, 599–610 (2005).
Kirschbaum, C., Kudielka, B. M., Gaab, J., Schommer, N. C. & Hellhammer, D. H. Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychosom. Med. 61, 154–162 (1999).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).
Pruessner, J. C., Kirschbaum, C., Meinlschmid, G. & Hellhammer, D. H. Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28, 916–931 (2003).
